Utah 
W-L: ( 4- 3) PR = 95.1398
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
206 A Duke ACC ( 8- 1, 98.1) 7-14
214 H Denver BE ( 4- 5, 95.1) 7- 8
221 A Merrimack MAAC ( 2- 8, 88.1) 17- 8
307 H Dartmouth IVY ( 4- 5, 94.2) 17-10
311 A Marquette BE ( 5- 4, 91.7) 16- 7
321 A Virginia ACC ( 6- 4, 96.7) 11-16
328 H Bellarmine ASUN ( 4- 8, 89.5) 20-14
404 A Mercer ASUN ( 5- 4, 89.8)
411 A Jacksonville ASUN ( 5- 4, 95.0)
418 H Queens ASUN ( 4- 5, 86.7)
425 H Air Force ASUN ( 2- 7, 89.9)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
206 A Duke 7-14 -7 -4 -1.20
214 H Denver 7- 8 -1 1 -1.82
221 A Merrimack 17- 8 9 6 0.00
307 H Dartmouth 17-10 7 2 + 3.22
311 A Marquette 16- 7 9 3 + 2.40
321 A Virginia 11-16 -5 -2 - -2.60
328 H Bellarmine 20-14 6 7 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
321 A Virginia 11-16 -5 -2 - -2.60
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
307 H Dartmouth 17-10 7 2 + 3.22
311 A Marquette 16- 7 9 3 + 2.40
|
Utah Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
| Air Force |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) |
Utah |
| Albany |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Army |
Army |
|
 
| Army |
| Bellarmine |
Utah |
Utah |
 
| |
| Binghamton |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Boston Univ |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Utah |
| Brown |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Bryant |
Utah |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| Bucknell |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Canisius |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Cleveland State |
Utah |
|
Utah   2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
|
| Colgate |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| Cornell |
Cornell |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Cornell |
| Dartmouth |
Utah |
Utah |
 
| |
| Delaware |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Denver |
Denver |
Denver |
 
| |
| Detroit Mercy |
Utah |
|
Utah   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Drexel |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Duke |
Duke |
Duke |
 
| |
| Fairfield |
Utah |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| Georgetown |
Georgetown |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Georgetown |
| Hampton |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Harvard |
Harvard |
|
tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) |
Harvard |
| High Point |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| Hobart |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Hofstra |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Holy Cross |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Utah |
| Iona |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Jacksonville |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| Johns Hopkins |
Johns Hopkins |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Johns Hopkins |
| Lafayette |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Le Moyne |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Lehigh |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| LIU |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Utah |
| Loyola |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Manhattan |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Marist |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Utah |
| Marquette |
Utah |
Utah |
 
| |
| Maryland |
Maryland |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Maryland |
| Massachusetts |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Utah |
| UMassLowell |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Mercer |
Utah |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| Mercyhurst |
Utah |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| Merrimack |
Utah |
Utah |
 
| |
| Michigan |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) |
Utah |
| Monmouth |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Mt St Marys |
Utah |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| Navy |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| NJIT |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| North Carolina |
North Carolina |
|
 
| North Carolina |
| Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
|
tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) |
Notre Dame |
| Ohio State |
Ohio State |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) |
Ohio State |
| Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Pennsylvania |
| Penn State |
Penn State |
|
 
| Penn State |
| Princeton |
Princeton |
|
 
| Princeton |
| Providence |
Utah |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) |
Utah |
| Queens |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Quinnipiac |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Utah |
| Richmond |
Richmond |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Richmond |
| Robert Morris |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Utah |
| Rutgers |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Utah |
| Sacred Heart |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Utah |
| Siena |
Utah |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| St Bonnies |
Utah |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| St Johns |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| St Josephs |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| Stony Brook |
Utah |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Utah |
| Syracuse |
Syracuse |
|
Syracuse   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Towson |
Towson |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Towson |
| UMBC |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Vermont |
Utah |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Utah |
| Villanova |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Virginia |
Virginia |
Virginia |
 
| |
| VMI |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Wagner |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
| Yale |
Utah |
|
 
| Utah |
PowerWise = 58

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.81
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Duke ( 8- 1, 98.1) 7-14 -1.78 16.42 0.82 1.26 -1.21
0 H Denver ( 4- 5, 95.1) 7- 8 -4.77 13.43 -0.82 1.26 -7.03
0 A Merrimack ( 2- 8, 88.1) 17- 8 -11.82 6.38 0.82 1.26 9.06
0 H Dartmouth ( 4- 5, 94.2) 17-10 -5.73 12.47 -0.82 1.26 14.66
0 A Marquette ( 5- 4, 91.7) 16- 7 -8.17 10.02 0.82 1.26 13.64
0 A Virginia ( 6- 4, 96.7) 11-16 -3.17 15.02 0.82 1.26 -2.96
0 H Bellarmine ( 4- 8, 89.5) 20-14 -10.45 7.75 -0.82 1.26 8.72
------
34.88
|
winning pts = 46.0744 losing points = -11.1948
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------